![]() ![]() Both chipsets perform at the same level, with the Exynos 990 eking out a lead over the SD865 versions of the S20. ![]() This test is designed to emulate how your phone performs when adding filters and beautify effects to your photos. PCMark's photo editing test is particularly interesting because it measures how long it takes to open, edit, and save images. It is a great indicator to day-to-day performance, and the SD865 variants of the S20 pull ahead of the Exynos verison. The writing test stresses the system's performance as it measures how long it takes to open, edit, and save a document. The scores are broadly identical across both variants of the S20, but it is interesting to see that the SD865 S20 fares worse in this test in 60Hz mode. The video editing test uses OpenGL ES 2.0 and stresses factors like video playback. The fact that the A55 cores on the Exynos 990 go up to 2.0GHz contributes to the slight advantage here, with the SD865's A55 cores going up to 1.8GHz. This particular test is targeted at the A55 cores, and we see that the Exynos 990-based S20 has a marginal lead over the SD865 version. Let's break down the numbers, kicking off with the web browsing test. ![]() Unlike other synthetic tests that are algorithm-based, PCMark focuses on real-world scenarios. PCMark Work 2.0 does a fantastic job emulating real-world usage conditions. Interestingly, we found that the S20 performed worse in 60Hz mode, suggesting Samsung is throttling the chipset to conserve power. As the 120Hz mode is limited to FHD, that's the resolution we used for 60Hz as well. We ran the tests at 120Hz and 60Hz just to see if there was a noticeable difference between the two modes. I'm also adding the Realme X50 - a $500 value flagship - to the list as a baseline for the Snapdragon 865. I'm on the 4G-only variant of the Exynos 990 Galaxy S20 (SM-G980F/DS), and my North American colleagues are using the Snapdragon 865 versions: Ara Wagoner has the regular Galaxy S20, and Andrew Martonik is using the Galaxy S20 Ultra. Qualcomm has been the runaway leader in this area for the last three years, so it will be interesting to see if the Mali-G77 with its new Valhall architecture is able to hold its own against the Adreno 650. The Snapdragon 865 has the Adreno 650, a refresh of last year's Adreno 640. On the GPU side of things, the Exynos 990 has the Mali-G77 MP11, with the MP11 indicating that 11 shader cores are active. The Snapdragon 865, meanwhile, has newer cores: there's a single A77 core running at 2.84GHz, three A77 cores at 2.50GHz, with the four A55 cores at 1.80GHz. The Exynos 990 has a combination of three cores: there are two high-performance Mongoose M5 cores at 2.73GHz, along with two Cortex A76 cores at 2.50GHz, and four energy-efficient A55 cores at 2.0GHz. Qualcomm has been in the lead for three years now, but Samsung gained a lot of ground with the Exynos 990.īefore we get started, let's take a look at what's on offer with each chipset. That was clearly the case in previous years, and things are unchanged in 2020 with the Galaxy S20 series. Source: Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central (Image credit: Source: Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central)Īlthough Samsung made considerable gains in the mobile SoC segment with its Exynos chipsets, its designs aren't quite on par with what the best that Qualcomm has to offer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |